Search for: "John Doe 2 " Results 5001 - 5020 of 12,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does that violate equal protection or Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:44 pm by justinsilverman
This means that, unless Elton John or his label permits “Rocket Man” to be reproduced, distributed or performed publicly—that includes online—anyone who does so infringes the copyright and could be liable unless the use qualifies as a fair use. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
The consuming public doesn't know what is or isn't disclaimed in a mark, and would see these two marks as members of the CLIMAX family.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 1:24 pm by Morris Turek
  The developer does not use the trademark in the title of its application, but does include it in the description and probably as a keyword as well. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., JOHN DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JOHN DOE, ESQ., JANE DOE, ESQ., LAW OFFICES OF JANE DOE, ESQ  the end of years of litigation appears. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:59 pm by Eric
Domain name registrar does not qualify for ACPA's registrar safe harbor when: "Transamerica alleges that Oversee and the Moniker Defendants, together with the ostensible registrants-the John Doe Defendants-are the de facto registrants of the domain names in question. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:08 am
And at least 2 percent of project funds should be allocated to such training. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 9:51 pm by Orin Kerr
In this case, the fact known to the government that is implicit in the act of providing the password for the devices is "I, John Doe, know the password for these devices") (emphasis added). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships, USA Today (last updated April 2, 2020). [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Weighing the probative value of the parties’ submissions, I find that petitioner has failed to prove that respondent’s Dignity Act determination was arbitrary or capricious (see Appeal of G.M., 62 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,257; Appeal of M.E., 62 id., Decision No. 18,248; Appeal of John and Jane Doe, 61 id., Decision No. 18,088). [read post]
14 May 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Weighing the probative value of the parties’ submissions, I find that petitioner has failed to prove that respondent’s Dignity Act determination was arbitrary or capricious (see Appeal of G.M., 62 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,257; Appeal of M.E., 62 id., Decision No. 18,248; Appeal of John and Jane Doe, 61 id., Decision No. 18,088). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Andrew Delaney
Now, if a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it, does it make it sound? [read post]