Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 6,603
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2011, 9:09 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
In American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:17 pm
By preventing Oklahoma's judges from properly considering treaties ratified by the government of the United States (which are supposed to be the "supreme law of the land"), Oklahoma's amendment is in direct conflict with the requirements of the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
Customers who click on the ad unit are taken to a landing page on the EPI website. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
PatchakDocket: 11-246Issue(s): (1) Whether the Quiet Title Act and its reservation of the United States’ sovereign immunity in suits involving "trust or restricted Indian lands" apply to all suits concerning land in which the United States "claims an interest," 28 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 9:10 am
By Cori Badgley In City of Palmdale v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:49 am
Teaver was not a seaman as defined in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
She escaped to the United States and sought asylum. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
Yet the United States Supreme Court - the highest court in all the land - issues opinions making wrongful convictions more likely. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm
United States Dep't of Agric., 441 F.3d 1214, 1218 (10th Cir. 2006); Baca-Prieto v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
On appeal, defendants argue that the State of California cannot regulate defendants’ sale of cigarettes to non-Indians because defendants are operating stores located on trust lands held by the United States for the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (the Band), a federally-recognized tribe. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:50 am
In Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm
Arizona; (2) whether the interviewer’s state of mind has any bearing on whether a suspect's statement is voluntary under the established law of Oregon v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
See Stewart v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:50 pm
Mohindroo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 2:57 pm
Likewise, the United States Constitution provides “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
The United States has general rights, general powers, and general obligations, not derived from any particular states, nor from all the particular states, taken separately; but resulting from the union of the whole: and, therefore, it is provided, in the fifth article of the confederation, “that for the more convenient management of the general interests of the United States, delegates shall be annually appointed to meet in congress. [read post]
