Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 5001 - 5020 of 21,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am by Raymond Millien
Two weeks ago, the United States Supreme Court decided to hear another patent case[1] – marking only the ninth time during the Chief Justice Roberts era that Court has decided to do so. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
No court will go along with this today as stated. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:51 am by Benjamin Wittes
Bush’s promise of robust review of the legality of the Guantanamo detainees’ detention has been effectively negated by decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, beginning with Al-Adahi v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Elio Fiorucci went all the way up to the Grand Chamber of theCourt of Justice of the European Union, which gave judgment this morning. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:06 pm
"Wrote Justice Kennedy for a majority of the Supreme Court, in today's new case Hall v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 10:47 am by M. Umberger
In an attempt to learn more about the legal aspects of The Gunpowder Plot, I came across a post from Lawfare, a blog on national security issues, that describes the commemoration as “one of the few–if not the only–holidays that mark the failure of non-state actors to bring down the symbols of state regimes. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 1:31 pm by Nelson Tebbe
Here are the first few paragraphs:"In Obergefell v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:27 am
The Conference will also mark the sixtieth anniversary of the 1958 New York Convention, which continues to play an important role in international investment disputes. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by Eric Goldman
Finally, the question remains whether use of a mark by the public will suffice to support a producer’s rights in that mark. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:15 pm
Says lawprof Neal Kumar Katyal, who is representing the state of Louisiana as it seeks to reopen the Supreme Court case Kennedy v. [read post]