Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Louboutin argued that YSL’s shoe infringed on its Red Sole Mark, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit concluded that the mark only applied to contrasting red soles. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 1:23 am
v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:02 am
The document emanates from the United States Patent and Trademark Office and is titled "Notice of Request for Comments on the Feasibility of Placing Economically Significant Patents Under a Secrecy Order and the Need to Review Criteria Used in Determining Secrecy Orders Related to National Security". [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm
From the intro: Leading off this week are two stays from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
Clorox Co., 241 F.3d 232, 238 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
Clorox Co., 241 F.3d 232, 238 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
The Respondent in the first case has filed an ACPA action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, Civil Action No. 09-3939 challenging the UDRP decision. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
United States, a 1910 Supreme Court opinion respecting the then-U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
In Larimer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 7:55 am
Allan Marks is a partner at Milbank LLP and a lecturer at UC Berkeley School of Law and UCLA School of Law. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
” After Gregg v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:49 am
The IPKat is really disappointed that this action is being brought in the United States and not in Europe following last month's Intel v CPM ruling (see IPKat here and here), where counsel on both sides could indulge in endless argument as to the state of mind of the relevant consumer, the likelihood of confusion and the extent to which the use of the mark on the t-shirt might be expected to affect the economic activity of consumers of the… [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 1:01 am
This provision was rendered inoperative by Loving v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:15 am
Ltd.. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
`The United States Supreme Court has recognized a tension between protection of reputation and protection of freedom of expression, which is the strongest when there is a media defendant, the subject matter is one of public interest or the plaintiff is a public official or a public figure. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
