Search for: "People v High" Results 5001 - 5020 of 15,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 1:30 pm
The wildly divergent results in those two high-profile cases — Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:14 pm by Shardha Rajam & Mihika Poddar
It tactfully skirted the broader question of whether a business can refuse to serve gay people, saying this “must await further elaboration”. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:50 am by Barry Sookman
Google was partially successful in the Court of Appeal, Google Inc v Trkulja (2016) 342 ALR 504 (but not on the policy issue that it was above the law) and the matter was then appealed to the High Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[vii] Thus, directors, officers, managers and similarly situated people need to closely examine the governing documents of the entity to determine what protection, if any, is conferred. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am by Darius Whelan
REFOCUS is made up of 10 people with experience of mental illness, and ten people who had family members who used the services. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am by Darius Whelan
REFOCUS is made up of 10 people with experience of mental illness, and ten people who had family members who used the services. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:57 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standard of Review and Applicable LawThe test for legal sufficiency is "whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 8:07 am
  NoteNelson Goh, The Power of Tribunals to Enjoin Criminal Proceedings: A Widening Power or Converging High Bar? [read post]