Search for: "State v. Core"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 7:04 am
In the Optis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
(iii) Flexibility v. checks and balances Heller’s justification for the turn to a ‘sentencing heuristic’ is founded on the overall assumption that (even) wider flexibility for States to investigate and prosecute might create better compliance. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lash has a sixty-page selection of post-ratification materials, including, for example, The Slaughter-House Cases and United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:35 pm
The state or any defendant may appeal from a judgment. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Indeed, since the conflict goes to the core of the Agency's administrative expertise - the interpretation of its own regulations - the conflict is probably even more pronounced.In the Kemp phony-violation situation, defense counsel also needs to consider how to get the FDA on record. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:01 am
State (Ind. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 11:23 am
In V.B. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:14 pm
See State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
UJ Allocation Inter-state complementarity ensures that core international crimes are investigated and prosecuted at national/State level. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 11:06 am
It is time for the United States to stop debating whether to address it, and start talking about how to address it. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 6:41 pm
Audubon Soc’y v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 5:34 pm
DauscherToday, the California Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:25 pm
In Imperial Oil Limited v. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 1:29 pm
I am opposed to the proposed rules on three grounds -- a misunderstanding of the concept of ethics (see Bates et. al. v State Bar of Arizona); the rules themselves will not likely be upheld at the first legal challenge to them; and there is clearly a misunderstanding of the meaning of marketing for lawyers and the long-term effects of Bates in serving both law firms and, most significantly, clients. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Stocks v. bonds. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
And expecting, even welcoming, minor problems also reinforces the value to the enterprise of security measures that may burden efficiency, such as encryption or segmentation.[11] It’s well understood that risk management is at the core of cybersecurity, and rightfully so. [read post]
