Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 5001 - 5020 of 14,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2009, 9:00 am
Since it didn't believe the City was given notice of the defects which triggered the plaintiffs' injuries, the New York State Court of Appeals thought both plaintiffs deserved to lose. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 1:08 pm by Giles Peaker
Taylor & Anor v Burton (2021) EWHC 1454 (Admin) This was an appeal by way of case stated from North Staffordshire Magistrates’ Court’s decision that there was damp at the tenant’s property such as to amount to a statutory nuisance at the time the information was laid, that the landlord and managing agents were the persons responsible for the nuisance, and although the nuisance had been abated by the trial hearing, the tenant should have costs of… [read post]
4 Jul 2008, 8:09 am
He does not want to lose his privacy in his home and effects, and he also does not want to have to install and pay for software and/or hardware that would allow other persons to monitor his computer use.John Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Communities for a Better Environment v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
Occasionally there are cases that seem to be tailor-made for legal geeks: Naruto v Slater; Lucasfilm v Ainsworth; DC Comics v Towle. [read post]