Search for: "State v. Word" Results 5001 - 5020 of 40,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am by Paul Cartwright
 In other words, was the negligent act or omission on the part of the defendant sufficiently closely linked to the harm to establish liability. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am by CMS
In other words, there may well be criminal investigations in which the expectation does not arise (the Supreme Court gave the example of public rioting, a behaviour which the court in In Re JR38 made clear Article 8 is not designed to protect). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
By contrast, in the United States the government firstly has to go to court and seek an injunction from an impartial judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:30 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
Dillon Gage Inc of Dallas v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, Supreme Court of Texas No. 21-0312, and United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit No. 20-10262 [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:12 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch California Institute of Technology v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
The central part of the 117-page opinion,  captioned Texas v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The Court found that the instance in question could be viewed as falling within the margin of appreciation accorded to member states: ‘the choice of the means calculated to secure compliance with article 8 of the Convention in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves is in principle a matter that falls within the contracting states’ margin of appreciation’, referencing the Grand Chamber in Bărbulescu v Romania ([125]). [read post]