Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 16,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 4:38 pm
But if the 9th Circuit went to the trouble of certifying the question, and will now wait at least six months for an answer, it seems likely the state court’s decision will have a strong influence on the result. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:32 pm
PharmaStem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:02 am
In Fortgang v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
Remarkably, the list stated that NGN had not searched for documents contained on or created by NGN’s computer equipment. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:11 am
Monster Energy Company v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 5:21 am
In February 2011, the district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:20 am
The case, Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
In Larson v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:28 pm
Carhart, and its decision earlier this summer in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm
Tambry and Suzanne were the lead plaintiffs in our case, Young v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
§ 1447(c).The Ninth Circuit has expressed a “strong presumption against removal. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 11:21 am
Corbett v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
" Derogatory, The Practical Standard Dictionary of the English Language (1936); see also State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:50 pm
Lynch v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
July 12, 2013) (post) and Brazil v. [read post]
