Search for: "Thomas v. Held"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2013, 5:10 am
Court of Appeals, Todd Matthew Thomas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:58 am
The Threat to Agency Enforcement Power A second case, SEC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:04 pm
As established in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 4:01 am
” At The Register, Thomas Claburn looks at Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 7:31 am
Justice Clarence Thomas voted with the majority in the case, Sykes v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 11:04 am
Additional Resources: Edwards v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
Francis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 3:35 am
Handing down a unanimous judgment, Lord Thomas and Lady Hale concurring for narrower reasons, Lord Mance (with whom Lord Neuberger and Lord Hodge agreed) held that the Bill was outside the legislative competence of the Welsh Assembly under both section 198(4) and 108(5) of the Government of Wales Act 2006 and was incompatible with the ECHR, A1P1. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 7:37 pm
Thomas, 885 F.2d 918, 922-23 (D.C. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:22 pm
See, e.g., Glencore, Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Plaintiff/Appellant, Thomas A. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:37 pm
Bond v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:54 am
§ 704(b), having granted cert in United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
Reimbursing NYSHIP Medicare-eligible retirees for Medicare Part B premiums Munger v Board of Educ. of the Garrison Union Free School Dist., 2011 NY Slip Op 05034, Appellate Division, Second Department Carol Munger and other retirees of the Garrison Union Free School District sued in an effort to recover damages for breach of contract and for a judgment declaring that they are entitled to reimbursement for money they expended for Medicare Part B premiums since reaching the age of 65. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
Next Week in the Courts Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media and related cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited, heard 25 and 26 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls and Moore-Bick and Moses LJJ) Ambrosiadou v Coward, heard 21 and 22 June 2010 (Eady J) Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward,… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
” With the possible exceptions of Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas (none of whom asked any questions during the argument), it certainly appeared that Justice Breyer was not alone. [read post]
23 May 2012, 10:57 am
On Monday, the Court decided Taniguchi v. [read post]
