Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 8,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 8:54 am
U.S. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 3:28 pm
" The post goes on to state that the aim of the Task Force on Treaties in U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
District Court, District of Arizona (Phoenix); appellate case, Cervantes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
FTC, 9th Cir., 2020) to Texas (Continental v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:40 pm
Walker v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Erickson, 393 U.S. 385 (1969); and Washington v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 5:56 pm
Hochul] Today U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
Additional coverage comes from Steven Nelson at U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
The lawsuit, Almerico et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
EPA, 12-1268; Texas v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am
In what was the most politically charged case since Bush v. [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land
21 Feb 2019, 10:37 am
The challengers appealed to the U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 5:02 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse discusses the prospect that the Court will take on the challenge to Texas’s new abortion laws, arguing that the “stakes couldn’t be higher, either for women who live in the growing number of states governed by anti-abortion politicians or for the court itself. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:33 am
She lost in a U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm
The United States has spoken on this issue in the recent U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
In Tenaska Energy Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:40 pm
As to related litigation, Litepanels states that it is asserting the ‘823, ‘290 and ‘117 patents in a co-pending action in the U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:02 am
From the motion for a preliminary injunction in Ricci v. [read post]