Search for: "US Constitution Petition"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 12,705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The case arose when two married same-sex couples had daughters in the state in 2015 using anonymous sperm donors. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
He announces that the cert petitions in “Donald J. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:49 am
Do you want a nondiscrimination principle or a pro-discrimination principle or do you think religion should win both ways: Government can't give us special treatment to hurt us, but it also must give us special treatment to help us? [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
The defense argued that the police conduct constituted a search.We have never said that the RAs were State actors. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
” Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:09 am
” Briefly: At Legal Sports Report, Daniel Wallach explains why he thinks the court will agree to review a cert petition stemming from New Jersey’s attempt to legalize sports betting that asks “whether a federal statute … that prohibits a modification or ‘repeal’ of state law prohibitions on private conduct (i.e., sports betting) impermissibly commandeers the regulatory power of the States, in contravention of the Tenth Amendment of the… [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:00 am
First, following identically from the pending case of Oil States, petitioner asks: Whether inter partes review—an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (“Patent Office”) to analyze the validity of existing patents—violates the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury? [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
[1]521 US 844 (1997) https://www.oyez.org/cases/1996/96-511 [2]Packingham v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari only on the first question presented: “Whether inter partes review – an adversarial process used by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to analyze the validity of existing patents – violates the Constitution by extinguishing private property rights through a non-Article III forum without a jury. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
“I will google this”, constitutes genericness automatically. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
The ruling is the culmination of years of litigation, and clears the way for Simon Shiao Tam and the Slants to register the name of their band as a US trademark. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
The ruling is the culmination of years of litigation, and clears the way for Simon Shiao Tam and the Slants to register the name of their band as a US trademark. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:55 am
New technologies, all too soon, can become instruments used to commit serious crimes. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:35 am
” This type of motion can be used by a defendant, including a public entity, in response to a lawsuit that challenges conduct by the defendant in furtherance of the defendant’s right of petition or free speech as defined by the anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm
Thereafter, the father’s petition to terminate his support obligations was granted. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 2:08 pm
The Court correctly applies our precedents, which no party has asked us to reconsider. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:47 pm
Kennedy tosses out the names of social-media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn, explaining that they are places for users to exchange political and social views with others, including petitioning their representatives on Twitter. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in a potentially significant patent case regarding whether the adversarial process currently used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to analyze the validity of and cancel existing patents is constitutional. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:19 am
Last week, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in a potentially significant patent case regarding whether the adversarial process currently used by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to analyze the validity of and cancel existing patents is constitutional. [read post]
