Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 5001 - 5020 of 7,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Among the first courts to address Levine in the context of a generic manufacturer was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Stacel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit)   United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  In Cline – answering questions of state law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court – the Oklahoma Supreme Court had nothing but good things to say about off-label use.Cline was somewhat different than Abbottin its facts. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am by Marie Louise
Lexar Media (Patently-O) District Court W D Louisiana: What nunc pro tunc means: Epic Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Richard Hunt
By claiming he was a victim not just of the particular barriers he encountered at one store but also a victim of a missing policy, the plaintiff was able to show that his claims applied to every store in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]