Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc."
Results 5001 - 5020
of 7,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
Judges who like to rhyme: United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
– EIPR article (PatLit) United States US Patent Reform Dr. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:50 am
The court held that classifications based on sexual orientation were subject to a heightened scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am
United States, 20-5758. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 12:26 am
It told the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit that it had "conferred with Appellee International Trade Commission and Intervenor Apple Inc., and neither party object[ed] to the requested voluntary dismissal. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
In Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
Wastewater, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am
That’s the majority rule across the United States. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:48 am
In affirming the district court's decision, the United States Supreme Court relied on the ‘collective entity‘ doctrine. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:20 am
Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:20 am
Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
United States, 342 F.3d 133, 142 (2d Cir.2003). [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Among the first courts to address Levine in the context of a generic manufacturer was the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Stacel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 6:36 pm
Inc. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:42 am
Lexar Media (Patently-O) District Court W D Louisiana: What nunc pro tunc means: Epic Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 9:19 am
Garza, 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
By claiming he was a victim not just of the particular barriers he encountered at one store but also a victim of a missing policy, the plaintiff was able to show that his claims applied to every store in the United States. [read post]
