Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2008, 6:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 6:50 am
After amendments to their complaint, the case was removed to the United States Central District of California, which on June 13, 2012 granted summary judgment to those plaintiffs, holding the covenants to be unenforceable under California law and public policy. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am
This contributed to an even worse decision in California v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 6:46 am
This contributed to an even worse decision in California v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California certified the class, and a jury awarded statutory and punitive damages totaling more than $60 million to the class. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 8:17 pm
The next Apple v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Keilholtz, 268 F.R.D at 336 (finding class definition that included persons who lived in the United States who own a home in which the disputed product was installed after a particular date was not subjective or imprecise); Chavez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
In Luckey v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Next, Tillman sought to pursue legal action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:52 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:04 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court declined to follow unpublished decisions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (which includes California) and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (within the Third Circuit), which had previously held that the notification made pursuant to the TILA automatically voided a security interest. [read post]
15 May 2013, 5:05 am
The TOS and the relationship between you and Yahoo shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. . . . [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
In their scholarly article, the authors examine where employment arbitration stands across the nation following several recent significant United States Supreme Court decisions regarding arbitration. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:23 am
Wright II said the United States is excluded from the operation of such state laws because of its sovereign immunity and ruled that the statutory deadlines are not binding on CMS. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
That question was recently addressed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
In 2016, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
State v. [read post]
