Search for: "United States v. Mannings" Results 5001 - 5020 of 6,942
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:34 am by Joel R. Brandes
On September 17, 2010, respondent and the child moved to the United States without notifying petitioner. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 8:59 am by Lawrence Solum
United States (1919), Justice Holmes wrote that “the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
 In the United States of America, no law requires carrying identification, unless one is a driver. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:56 am by Susan Brenner
” Specifically, the statute provides as follows: Whoever travels in or causes another . . . to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes another . . . to use the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, with intent that a murder be committed in violation of the laws of any State or the United States as consideration for the receipt of, or as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay, anything of pecuniary value . . . shall be… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University  COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:48 pm by Bradley Joondeph
The second (raised only in Florida v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm by Eva Arevuo
 This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
Secretary of State for the Home Department v CD [2011] EWHC 2087 (Admin) (29 July 2011): Control order ruled lawful: “reasonable grounds for suspecting CD is a leading figure in network of Islamist extremists” – see guardian.co.uk SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
The Declaratory Judgment Act provides that, "In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction . . . any court of the United States . . . may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:29 pm by lawmrh
United States] Cleopatra: A Life by Stacy Schiff [Picked by James J. [read post]