Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 5001 - 5020 of 8,368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Florian Mueller
Judge Albright of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas is an outlier in the U.S., and German judges would be slightly more subtle at public events, but their extremist rulings speak louder than any roadshow possibly could.I've saved the most important point for last: what opened the floodgates against all warnings was this year's Unwired Planet v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:01 pm by William Duncan - Guest
Thus would the voters of California and the taxpayers of the United States be deprived of a say in this most fundamental legal matter. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 7:09 am
Perry -- that it didn't violate the Establishment Clause for the state of Texas to have a 10 Commandments monument on its state capitol grounds. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:42 am by Amy Howe
” In the Los Angeles Times, David Savage looks ahead to United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Farrah Nagrampa
Sachs, in which the court will determine when an entity is an “agent” of a “foreign state” under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and Ocasio v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Texas, 12-5813, appears to be a fairly straightforward hold for Boyer v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 7:40 am by Steve Lubet
Texas (not Kansas) in 2003, overturning sodomy laws in the 14 states where they the still existed. [read post]
31 May 2014, 5:22 am by SHG
  After all, it’s only been the law since 1989, when the Supremes decided Texas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:42 am by ALeonard
  Now, engaging in gay sex in private is not a crime of moral turpitude in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am by Amy Howe
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, demonstrated that “the administration’s hard line on the standard for criminalization has gone so far as to alarm several members of the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am by Amy Howe
The state points to the two earlier versions of the order, which targeted Muslim countries, as well as comments and tweets made by the president calling for a ban on the entry of Muslims into the United States. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 10:31 am by Michael Grossman
After evaluating her claim, the district court ruled in favor of Match.com, citing Title 47, Section 230 of the United States Code, known as the Communications Decency Act (CDA). [read post]