Search for: "VI" Results 5001 - 5020 of 13,323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 9:13 am
  Future CJEU decisions can be accorded persuasive authority in UK courts, but this will not guarantee a consistent approach in the UK vis-a-vis the EU. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:57 am by Simon Lovegrove
Examples include: (i) shopping around and switching; (ii) wake-up packs; (iii) the FCA’s response to the Competition and Markets Authority review of retail banking; (iv) work on the strategic review of retail banking business models; (v) cash savings market study remedies; (vi) firms’ pricing practices; (vii) maturity of interest-only mortgages; (viii) customers with long-term mortgage arrears; and (ix) debt management sector review; and consumer vulnerability and access to… [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Renae Lloyd
The White Law Group is investigating the following Wells Real Estate Funds’ offerings, among others: Wells Real Estate Fund I Wells Real Estate Fund II Wells Real Estate Fund II-OW Wells Real Estate Fund III LP Wells Real Estate Fund IV LP Wells Real Estate Fund V LP Wells Real Estate Fund VI LP Wells Real Estate Fund VII LP Wells Real Estate Fund VIII LP Wells Real Estate Fund IX LP Wells Real Estate Fund X LP Wells Real Estate Fund XI LP Wells Real Estate Fund XII LP Wells Real… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:55 pm
   In this Will:      (g)  “Secondary Estate” means collectively:            (i)   all Private Businesses;            (ii)  any assets held in trust for me by the Private Businesses;            (iii) any beneficial interests I may have in any trust for which a Grant is… [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 2:33 pm
I am happy to announce an upcoming conference at Penn State: New International Trade and Rules Between Globalization and Anti-Globalization. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 6:44 am by Alexandra Villarreal O'Rourke
  Think of it as your competitive advantage vis-a-vis your fellow responders. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
The Judge held that they would not for, inter alia, the following reasons: (i) ASI did not use the sign ARGOS in relation to goods or services which are identical to those for which AUL’s marks are registered; (ii) ASI’s use of the sign ARGOS did not affect and was not liable to affect any of the functions of AUL’s marks; (iii) ASI’s use of the sign ARGOS did not give rise to a link between the sign and AUL’s marks in the mind of the average consumer; (iv) ASI’s… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
For processing carried out for journalistic purposes or the purpose of academic artistic or literary expression, Member States shall provide for exemptions or derogations from Chapter II (principles), Chapter III (rights of the data subject), Chapter IV (controller and processor), Chapter V (transfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations), Chapter VI (independent supervisory authorities), Chapter VII (cooperation and consistency) and Chapter IX (specific data… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 10:04 pm by Matthias Weller
The counterbalance introduced by the new law – namely that the recognition would be conditional upon reciprocity – does not really help: it will simply make the system inoperative vis-à-vis most foreign states. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 7:06 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  The claims at issue (Counts V and VI of Plaintiff’’s complaint) were based on the Defendants’ use of Syngenta’s label. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:14 pm by Patricia Salkin
Lastly, Counts V, VI, and VII were all found ripe because they alleged state law violations or sought injunctive relief based on the enactment of the three ordinances. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 2:55 am
" Here's the idea: The economic turmoil of the past years has drawn attention to the role of financial institutions play vis-à-vis human rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:55 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Second, Title VI is limited in its scope, as only financial debt can be restructured as part of the process. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am by Walter Olson
., see relevant section VI, pp. 31-41 of opinion via John Ross, Short Circuit] As Hans Bader of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has pointed out, the Ninth Circuit in 2000 slapped down federal officials for having investigated Berkeley, Calif. residents who had fought a housing project that they believed would bring mentally ill residents or recovering substance abusers (both protected as disabled under the Fair Housing Act) to their neighborhood. [read post]