Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5001 - 5020
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2024, 12:30 pm
The "open fields" doctrine permits gov't officials to roam private land without consent, a warrant, or probable cause as long as they don't enter the "curtilage" around a home. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:39 am
If schools don't have the authority to discipline J. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:58 am
Don't get me wrong: I don't think that possession of pornographic images on a computer makes a person a sex offender or a danger to society. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 6:53 pm
Thus, copyright owners often send notices that don't comply literally with 512(c)(3)'s technical requirements. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:56 pm
Instead, the court implicitly adopts the Daubert standard (a standard used in other jurisdictions – ironically, those that don’t even use urine testing – that allows judges to simply take judicial notice of reliability of urine testing). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 9:18 am
Ali planned to murder those guards, I don't think anybody on that jury would have hesitated to sentence him to death," Chapman said.Related posts are in the jury index. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
Perhaps this difficulty agreeing on 47 USC 230's application makes sense for state courts that don't see 47 USC 230 cases regularly and might be surprised by the counter-intuitive breadth of Congress' immunity. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:04 am
Isn't a Higher Originality Standard the More Obvious Solution? [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:28 pm
But, given the Judge's imposition of the upward departure, I wouldn't hold my breath hoping he's inclined to cut the former Governor some slack. [read post]
4 Nov 2006, 5:15 am
I do know that I don't want the job. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:23 am
When someone wins a lawsuit, the judge, jury, court of appeals and Texas Supreme Court all believed that the case was valid — which proves just how wide the gulf is between the reality and the rhetoric of tort reform: These proposals don't stop frivolous lawsuits; they simply limit liability in meritorious ones. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
I don’t see that interpretation of the disclosure at all, but it’s also easy to imagine rewording Bleeping’s disclosures to downgrade the risks. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 11:48 am
Under this theory, don't they have to return the money? [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am
Of the 173 respondents, the answers were:Yes: 3%No: 62%Only when the media is paying attention: 27% Don't know/can't tell: 6%(Figures don't add to 100% due to rounding)In the agency's self-evaluation report (pdf, hereafter SER) for the Sunset Commission, the agency opined (p. 3), "A judicial office is a public trust. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Implications * Anti-spammers don't win in court just by showing up. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
Then we have amendments where the agreement is made to require 60 votes to pass it where you don? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:51 pm
But we don’t set deadlines and say, “If you don’t take this offer, don’t make another demand” just out of spite. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm
The timorous may stay at home.' While we certainly wouldn‘t presume to question Judge Cardozo‘s poetic alliteration [sic], his reasoning does not apply here. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:51 am
I certainly don’t think they have got any worse. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:48 am
" "If that isn't equality," he joked, "I don't know what is. [read post]
