Search for: "Bounds v. State"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 9,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 1:12 pm
Most recently, in Zuri-Kinshasa v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:53 am
Kelly v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 12:01 pm
In Ogden v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
Partnership v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Of course the Supreme Court, being the highest court of England & Wales, will not be bound by the following decisions; nor is it bound by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights – (it is only required to ‘take them into account’ under s.2 Human Rights Act 1998 – something which the Conservative Party would do well to note), but this should hopefully provide an interesting background to the appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:58 pm
Of course the Supreme Court, being the highest court of England & Wales, will not be bound by the following decisions; nor is it bound by the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights – (it is only required to ‘take them into account’ under s.2 Human Rights Act 1998 – something which the Conservative Party would do well to note), but this should hopefully provide an interesting background to the appeal. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:12 pm
To recap, the possession order was made before the decision of the Supreme Court in Manchester CC v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45 and at a time when the Court was still bound by Kay and Doherty. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 10:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am
In terms of the Share Purchase Agreement the defender bound himself for a period of three years from 16 January 2012 to abide by similar further restrictive covenants (cl.7).[3] The defender breached the covenants in both Agreements. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm
Where the right to freedom of expression of a person bound by professional confidentiality is being balanced against the right of employers to manage their staff, the relevant criteria have been laid down in the Court’s case-law since its Grand Chamber judgment in the case of Guja v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 1:50 pm
This becomes still more uncertain where such mention comes after the word “especially”[v]. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
As Justice Kennedy put it in Arizona v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:05 am
In a landmark case on joint custody, Beck v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:30 am
” (Reno v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
Chapter Readings· Marbury v. [read post]
