Search for: "Burden v. Burden" Results 5021 - 5040 of 31,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff could not make out a prima facie case of unlawful retaliation by showing that the challenged actions were not causally connected to any protected activity engaged in by the plaintiff (see Langton v Warwick Val. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants met their initial burden of demonstrating that the plaintiff could not make out a prima facie case of unlawful retaliation by showing that the challenged actions were not causally connected to any protected activity engaged in by the plaintiff (see Langton v Warwick Val. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since plaintiff did not meet his initial burden, the burden did not shift to defendant to raise an issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). [read post]
4 May 2008, 7:52 am
UM - STAY OF ARBITRATION - POLICE REPORT SUBMISSION - PRIORITY OF COVERAGEMatter of GEICO v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:28 am by Antony Swiatek, Olswang LLP
Employment Tribunal Following Whent v T Cartledge Ltd, BET Catering Services Ltd v Ball and Glendale Managed Services Ltd v Graham, the Appellants claimed that Regulation 5 of TUPE obliged the Respondent to comply with the Collective Agreements and it had therefore made unauthorised deductions from their pay in not doing so. [read post]