Search for: "Court v. State"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 207,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 7:27 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
(University Lakes Justice Court No. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s 1977 ruling in Illinois Brick Company v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 6:22 am
Am., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In Imburgia v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
As the Court explained in South Carolina v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:43 am
The court relied on its previous ruling in Bailey v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Gonzales (California Court of Appeal), United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:15 am
" In contrast, although the ADEA does contain a clear congressional statement of intent to abrogate the States' immunity, the Supreme Court in Kimel v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Williams v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
” State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 4:13 pm
Effectively the court rewrote the earlier statute to convict Milliner.CALDER v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:28 pm
The State concedes that the theft conviction merges into the robbery for sentencing purposes. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
The United States Supreme Court has affirmed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
Indeed, the Court held that in the event of ambiguity, the interpretive "canon" of California State Bd. of Equalization v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:19 am
§2501, provides: "Every claim of which the United States Court of Federal Claims has... [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
First, it re-states state law on this point. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court will address in its upcoming term, is important because the Court previously granted states immunity from federal antitrust law in Parker v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:08 pm
In Gospel Light Mennonite Church Medical Aid Plan v. [read post]
