Search for: "Doe VI"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 5,651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2009, 11:55 am
Read in conjunction with the third executive order closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility, the government will now have to decide what to do with these prisoners-- whether to release them, try them in the criminal process, try them by traditional courts martial, or create a new set of procedures to try them (that is because, according to the third executive order reprinted below, the Administration is not going to use the military tribunals created by the Military Commissions Act of… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 12:47 pm
VI. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am
Mr Mulcaire argued that: (i) Information obtained by Mr Mulcaire from intercepting the voice messages of Ms Phillips and/or Mr Coogan was not ‘intellectual property’ and therefore section 72 cannot apply; (ii) If the information in question was ‘intellectual property’: (a) Mr Mulcaire would, if he were required to provide all the information ordered by Mann J, and some of the information ordered by Vos J, be at risk of being prosecuted for an offence which… [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:13 am
More specifically, subsection 10(9)(b) of CASL, which is one category of implied consent under the new legislation, provides: “(9) Consent is implied for the purpose of section 6 only if … (b) the person to whom the message is sent has conspicuously published, or has caused to be conspicuously published, the electronic address to which the message is sent, the publication is not accompanied by a statement that the person does not wish to receive unsolicited commercial… [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Nor does it impose its own notion of a child's best interests on a family. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 6:39 pm
But, the matter at hand does not constitute an emergency. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:41 am
The CWC does not authorise or legitimise CW use under specific circumstances. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:59 am
"**VI. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 2:38 pm
Caveat Emptor (Buyer Beware). [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
So, it was open to a court to stay for ‘non court based dispute resolution’ even where the parties or a party was unwilling, so long as the order made: (a) does not impair the very essence of the claimant’s right to a fair trial, (b) is made in pursuit of a legitimate aim, and (c) is proportionate to achieving that legitimate aim. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 6:04 pm
In many child protective proceedings, the most damaging evidence a respondent must face is hearsay or unsworn testimony of the subject child admitted under Family Court Act § 1046(a)(vi). [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 3:33 pm
" [36] Sabet went on to explain that California's policy against enforcing non-competes lead to the rise of Silicon Valley as a leader in the technology industry. [37] VI. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm
It should be noted that accepting a claim does not mean the PR will pay the entire claim. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
Maryland's official code website does not yet incorporate the new medical marijuana law, and I could not find the full text elsewhere, so I post the law below, as shown in Md. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:37 pm
Once the Department of Commerce does come to a decision on whether to initiate an investigation, if it (a) rejects the Petition, thus not initiating an investigation, the case will end or (b) accepts the Petition, thus initiating an investigation, the timeline for clarity can be as long as one year with significant costs imposed during that year. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
=9A Fax: (951) = 682-5348 maureen@moynihanlyons.com moynihanlyons.com N= OTICE:= Receipt of this email does not, by itself, create any lawyer/client = relationship between us. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:38 am
SECTION VI. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
The Medellin case constitutes a serious setback to those who would argue that the Supremacy Clause, Article VI, cl.2 of the US Constitution, means what it says: "Treaties . . . shall be the supreme Law of the Land. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 6:43 am
The fact that access to that content is far easier with hyperlinks than with footnotes does not change the reality that a hyperlink, by itself, is content-neutral – it expresses no opinion, nor does it have any control over, the content to which it refers. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
LEXIS 6793 (9th Cir 4/4/2011) (dissent) “An opinion, especially in habeas, that starts with the gruesome recounting of the facts usually does not bode well for the petitioner; it especially does not bode well when the issue is IAC at sentencing, with AEDPA deference. [read post]
