Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 41,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 10:31 am
To this end, the court considered the following:(1) The nature of the speech The ECtHR found that domestic courts had erred in considering that the nature of the speech at hand would be relevant to the determination of whether Article 10 applies: freedom of expression, in fact, is not limited to certain types of information or ideas or forms of expression: In other words, workplace-related free speech does not only protect comments that demonstrably contribute to… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
Ct. 10, 15 (2013). [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:19 pm
Pp. 10–13. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 3:38 am
Rather, revocation 11 proceedings may be brought before the UPC even if an opposition before the EPO is pending, see Art. 33 (8), (10) UPCA. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
What the evidence is alleged to be proving is explained by the [opponent] in the notice of opposition (see also point [1.5] above), in particular with respect to the sole alleged distinguishing feature of the characterising part of claim 1 over D1. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
As a consequence, the absence of enabling examples does not necessarily mean that the claimed invention is not sufficiently disclosed. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
(H038563; 216 Cal.App.4th 1373; Santa Clara County Superior Court; 1-10-CV167289.) [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:38 am
(Eugene Volokh) The 2–1 decision is Maksym v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 3:33 am
First, in some circumstances, the cooling-off period can be longer than 90 days – the rule provides that the first trade under a new plan occur after the later of 90 days or two days after filing the 10-Q or 10-K for the fiscal quarter in which the plan was adopted. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:05 am
However, this interpretation does not appear to be consistent with the purpose of the third sentence of Article 10(1). [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:50 am
The test includes four components: 1. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
Before executing the will or codicil, I was informed that: 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:32 am
” Dahl, slip op. at 10. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm
§ 1028A(a)(1), the identity theft statute. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:53 pm
AND, SO WHY DOES THE CDC NOT NAME THEM? [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 12:00 am
One circuit has flatly rejected the attempt to use section 547(c)(1) to extend the 10-day period, while another has allowed such an extension, supported by a summary affirmance in another circuit of such an extension by a bankruptcy appellate panel where the delay in perfection was satisfactorily explained.FN8 But nothing in the latter two cases does anything to answer our concern that this is simply an end run around the 10-day limit and so a disregard of… [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
If you would prefer to cut to the chase, here are my ten axes along which copyright and freedom of expression intersect:1. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:01 am
The Board does not agree:[5.1] In the [opponents’] opinion the wording “obtained from”, present twice in the final part of claim 1 of the second auxiliary request (for specifying the microorganisms from which the ? [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Aug. 10, 2015). [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:16-1. [read post]
