Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 7,369
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 7:25 am
For some states, that could require major spending on court-appointed lawyers for thousands of convicts.The federal case mentioned is Martinez v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
Glover, who “misstate” the state of American law. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
One case that comes to mind is Mehraban v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:09 am
In Sherdley & Anr v Nordea Life and Pension SA the Court of Appeal was asked to examine whether the English Court had jurisdiction to try a claim brought by British nationals who were not, at the time proceedings were commenced, resident in the UK. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm
Clearly more is required for a provider to acquire a sufficient state of knowledge to be deprived of the statutory protection” [60]. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
The continual state of “fear and anguish” (comp. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
Secretary of State and J v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am
In W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment The Supreme Court has made a difficult decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:46 pm
Professor Wells then traces the English roots of seditious libel and the rise and fall of seditious libel prosecutions within the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:12 pm
Boris Kasolowsky/Magdalene Steup: “Dallah v Pakistan – Umfang und Grenzen der Kompetenz-Kompetenz von Schiedsgerichten” – the English abstract reads as follows: The UK Supreme Court and the Paris Cour d’appel have recently confirmed, in connection with the ICC arbitration involving Dallah and Pakistan, that the national state courts are not bound by any determinations made by an arbitration tribunal with regard to the existence of a valid… [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm
Clearly more is required for a provider to acquire a sufficient state of knowledge to be deprived of the statutory protection” [60]. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:26 am
March v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:58 am
Secondly Wimmer wanted to engage an English cameraman so he approached Chris Riley of Wide Eyed Entertainment Ltd. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:27 am
Whilst the English court should apply a strong presumption that the procedures of other Convention States complied with Article 6, it was not wrong for an English court to consider whether a judgment of a court of a Convention State contravened the Convention. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
Rajesh Batra v. [read post]
