Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 67,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2014, 8:18 pm
In Bentley v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Per Clairmont v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:02 pm
The fruition of that absorption of DP law into Article 8 is apparent in the recent decision of Catt v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
Vaz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Fox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 9:12 pm
Thereasense, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Abdullah v Westminster City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1171Do matrimonial home rights apply where notice to leave to a non-tenant spouse has been given by a joint tenant who is not the spouse? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:51 am
The UK Court of Appeal has given its judgment in the case of Smith v Pimlico Plumbers and has allowed the appeal by the appellant in relation to his claim for holiday pay. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 5:01 pm
Given her own record of dubious prosecutorial conduct, perhaps it's unsurprising she found Nifong's behavior so appealing.Georgia Supreme Court, Carr v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:26 am
Abdullah v Westminster City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1171Do matrimonial home rights apply where notice to leave to a non-tenant spouse has been given by a joint tenant who is not the spouse? [read post]
Argument preview: Justices to hear second set of arguments on reservation status of eastern Oklahoma
30 Apr 2020, 8:30 am
Enter Carpenter v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:18 am
Contrast this decision with Litchmore v Lewisham, where no conditions were set. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:35 pm
Marsden; Samuel v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am
Given the lead attorney describes his legal practice as “fighting back against cancel culture,” I doubt we’ve heard the last of this lawsuit. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:40 am
They clarified that although a provision effecting double recovery of tax is not forbidden by the ECHR, A1P1, it is at risk of being found disproportionate, given that sums payable pursuant to POCA 2002 are intended to be deterrent and not punitive. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 5:30 am
This week a seven strong bench of the Supreme Court will hear an important appeal concerning statelessness, Secretary for State of the Home Department v B2. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
Bell, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:21 pm
In Paton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 11:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
Following the decisions in Gulati v MGN Limited [2017] QB 149 and Lloyd v Google LLC [2022] AC 1217, one may have thought that a misuse of private information claim was more advantageous. [read post]
