Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 6,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2010, 1:17 pm
v=rH9iubVWrj0 I appealed a municipal court judge’s decision denying my client’s application for post-conviction relief. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:21 pm
This issue is currently pending before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), no. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), 171 Cal.App.4th 645 (2009) (rev. granted 06/10/09). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum), no. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Lee v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:23 am
Roche Molecular Systems, 09-1159 (Supreme Court 2010) The Supreme Court has granted Stanford's petition for a writ of certiorari in Stanford v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
The cases in which the Court granted cert. this morning are: Title: Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 4:30 am
In its original ruling, the court granted granted the motion. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 10:01 pm
v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:29 am
The Quebec Superior Court granted their motions and dismissed the action. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:18 am
This week the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court issued its opinion in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
It is both a political and a judicial process in that in order to be extradited, both the Minister of Justice and a Superior Court judge must sign-off on the decision. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:53 pm
Curry, a Los Angeles County Superior Court jury convicted Mr. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:18 pm
Superior Court, discussed here.The trial court (Judge Lichtman, LASC) granted the employer's motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff's claims were barred by res judicata. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
”Further, noted the court, provisional appointments carry no expectation nor right of tenure. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am
In return for granting the right to exclude others from making or using a patented invention, the inventor must disclose or conversely not conceal from the public the preferred embodiment. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:12 pm
In granting the application the Court noted as follows: [12] The defendant submits that although Rule 7-6 (1)-(3) makes no specific provision for a person other than the party to be examined to attend and answer questions, Wong (guardian ad litem) v. [read post]
