Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 5021 - 5040 of 9,822
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2015, 5:31 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
If the Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it is not re-tried at the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:31 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
If the Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it is not re-tried at the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:31 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
If the Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it is not re-tried at the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:31 am by Sickels Frei Mims, P.C.
If the Supreme Court decides to hear a case, it is not re-tried at the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
The trial judge found L.P. incompetent to testify at trial, but allowed seven witnesses—including his preschool teachers, police officers, social workers, his maternal grandmother and his maternal great aunt to testify as to what L.P. had told them. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Feb. 26, 2015) (magistrate judge) Grasshopper sells a moon-shaped backrest designed to be attached behind the driver’s seat of a motorcycle. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:05 am by Simon Fodden
They’re not even machines. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
In addition, we’re still waiting to hear which Conference the Court selects for the rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
 [Bauman’s] gloss on due process may lead New York courts to revisit Judge Cardozo's well-known and oft-repeated jurisdictional incantation.Id. at 224 n.2. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:19 am by Joseph A. Ranney
 Nevetheless, Booth inspired other antislavery judges: Ohio’s supreme court missed joining Wisconsin by one vote (In re Bushnell, 1858), and Maine’s court joined Wisconsin on the eve of the Civil War (In re Opinion of the Justices, 1861). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:06 am
The interplay of terrorism themes against counter themes flatten discourse (one cannot judge the relative value of specific violations against each other to determine a hierarchy of terror) and advance the argument that one cannot exist without the other. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:19 am by Joy Waltemath
While the judge correctly found that the dispatcher’s statement that “we’re going to get all of you guys out” was an unlawful threat, the Board disagreed with his finding that the “backstabber” comment referred solely to the employee and the dispatcher’s being personally upset because he called him a liar. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
  No design defect theory would establish the defendant's liability as against the plaintiff was simply being allergic to all contacts. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
The Judge concluded (at [98]) that the balancing exercise came down firmly in favour of CG because the information that was being published harmed the public interest creating a risk of re-offending, incited violence and hatred, was indiscriminate and lead to the potential for public order situations to develop and was an attempt to hunt a sex offender, to drive him from his home and expose him to vilification. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on which see her earlier post here]. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:35 am by Helene L Taylor
A panicked Myrna then learned that a judge had terminated her spousal support. [read post]