Search for: "In Re Black"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 15,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
After that complex matter, we’re ready for something a bit easier to handle. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:12 am
It is black letter law that a person cannot establish itself as another’s agent such that it may bind the purported principal without that principal’s consent unless the principal ratifies the agent’s actions. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
On the other hand, when you're the White House press secretary and your great defense of how it is you think you're going to win is that oral arguments can be misleading, and you don't have anything good to point to, you do know you're in trouble. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Carpenter, Calling Bulls**t on the Lanham Act: The 2(a) Bar for Scandalous, Immoral, and Disparaging Marks Various “bullshit” marks have been refused registration, whereas BLACK TAIL, BIG PECKER’S, and BADASS all made it through. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:35 am
They’re always giving out awards. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
And regardless of how Oliver fares with the damage question down in Columbus, they're right. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
We can debate whether we’re serious about this principle, but it sounds good. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:55 am
Black’s Law Dictionary 117 (5th ed. 1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 8:51 am
We’re convinced that buying a cup of coffee is a big deal. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:22 am
And then the case falls into the black hole of delay. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 4:20 am
Now we’re getting closer to something objectively definable, although more refinement is needed to nail it down. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:50 am
(You can read more about it HERE if you’re so inclined.) [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 am
And you think you’re the enlightened ones. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:38 am
If you’re a private sector employer, you can generally fire an at-will employee for his or her political beliefs or expression. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm
” In re Marriage of Wycoff, 266 Ill. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds In re G.G. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
Why was a mid-range sentence appropriate at the first sentencing, but an above-range, statutory maximum sentence appropriate at re-sentencing based on the assault? [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:01 am
Go out and you’re fair game. [read post]
9 May 2025, 5:35 am
We’re ready to put our experience to work for you. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:55 am
Black’s Law Dictionary 117 (5th ed. 1979) (citations omitted). [read post]
