Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones" Results 5021 - 5040 of 6,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
Charter Fishing Trip“To Have and Have Not” (Warner Bros. 1944) The National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) published a rule requiring owner and operators of for-hire vessel operating in the Gulf of Mexico to (1) install GPS devices that constantly archived the vessel’s locations, and (2) allow federal fisheries enforcement personnel access to the information. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
The majority reasoned that either Congress did not contemplate the question of whether the signatures supporting a showing of interest in a deauthorization petition may predate an effective contract containing a union-security clause, or that Congress did consider the question but left it to the Board, saying: "Either way, the fact of the matter is that the statutory language is inconclusive, thus it falls to the Board as the agency charged with administering the Act to fill in the… [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Agencies Announce Plans for More Equity in Federal Programs MSN – Michael Macagnone (Roll Call) | Published: 4/14/2022 Dozens of federal agencies launched plans that focus on minority groups and other underserved communities, meant to open federal programs to more people and reduce racial disparities caused by government decisions. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 4:14 am by Emma Snell
Juston Jones reports for the New York Times. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 12:14 pm by Marina Wilson
Just below this text, a strip states the general focus of the firm: maritime Jones Act claims for injury and wrongful death. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Recently, the Ontario Court of Appeal linked that jurisprudence to an examination of informational privacy in Jones v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Misrepresentation as to a collateral matter does not suffice to satisfy the legal requirement of lack of consent. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:55 pm
The result was a parliamentary draw: the specific matters proposed in the House of Bishops were not officially referred to the Commission, but they went nowhere else, and the mandate of the interim Commission was broad enough to allow it to entertain proposals for amendment from whatever source they came. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:33 am
 The Emancipation Proclamation, as Howard Jones observes in his study of Lincoln's war diplomacy, was timed in large part to stem fears of Britain recognizing the Confederacy. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The breach of the peace conviction required: publicly [posting] offensive, indecent or abusive matter concerning any person . . . with the intent to cause inconvenience, annoyance or alarm. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am by Russell Knight
The best evidence rule does not apply where a party seeks to prove a fact which has an existence independent of any writing, even though the fact might have been reduced to, or is evidenced by, a writing” Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:54 am by Susan Brenner
Jones, 308 F.3d 748 (2002), the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:06 am
The court then rejected several arguments made by the government to justify retaining the non-responsive files: First, [the government] argues that it must be allowed to make the mirror image copies as a matter of practical necessity and, according to the Government’s investigators, those mirror images were “the government’s property. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 8:00 am by Sasha Volokh
I discuss various complexities and counterarguments: (1) Race is not different than sex or sexual orientation for purposes of the doctrine. (2) The market context may not matter, especially after 303 Creative. (3) The conditional-federal-funding context does give the government more power than a simple regulatory context: the government will still be able to induce race-neutrality by the threat of withdrawing federal funds. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 6:55 am by admin
  As referenced in a lengthy Mother Jones article to which we’ll return (its quotes in Calibri):   It involved something called an “assignment of mortgage,” the document that certifies who owns the property and is thus entitled to foreclose on it. [read post]