Search for: "In re Brown" Results 5021 - 5040 of 7,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2024, 12:00 pm by Anu Joshi
Candidates would do well to listen to them, not just to capture votes, but because they’re sound policy solutions. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:09 am by Emmanuel Didier
- The Israeli Test Case KURT XERRI: The Effect of Fiduciary Obligations on the Maltese Civil Law Contract of Mandate DELANO COLE VAN DER LINDE: The Complex Hybridity of South African Criminal Law 12:00 to 13:00 Lunch 13:00 to 14:00 Parallel sessions: The Erosion of Differences in Mixed Jurisdictions  Parallel sessions: Judges as Agents of Diffusion GIANLUCA PAROLIN: Postcolonial Quandary: Revisiting Malta’s Mixity … [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm by Sandra Park
Fair housing means that all of us — regardless of our race, where we’re born, our gender, or whether we have a disability — have equal access to safe and stable housing. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 8:10 am
You're betting someone other than Brady or Mahomes tosses the pigskin just once. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:18 am
 Never too late 40 [week ending on Sunday 5 April] – OHIM and national res judicata in Case T 378/13 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd and Star Fruits Diffusion v OHIM |Scrabble v Scramble is not a game in JW Spear & Sons Ltd & Others v Zynga Inc | Nagoya UK and EU implementing regulations | Again on making available and communication in CJEU's decision C More | Brown epilators in Albania | More food for thought regarding… [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:05 am by John Jascob
PCAOB Member Jay Brown asked if SAG members were interested in other mechanisms the PCAOB could use to communicate with stakeholders. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:04 am by azatty
Let me know if you’re reading the book, and what you think. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thomas, Alito, et al that the original (and supposedly widely shared) understanding of some vague constitutional term just happens to align perfectly with the Republican Party's ideological agenda in the 21st century--the Jack Daniel's case is a welcome diversion.At a minimum, the case illustrates that the people who operate Jack Daniel's and/or its corporate overlord Brown-Forman are a bunch of stuffed shirts. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
In a lower profile race, Stephanie Morales won re-election as district attorney in Portsmouth City despite having convicted a white police officer in the killing of a Black teenager. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 1:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
In this chapter, the author explores a new way to address the widening gulf between the power wielded by corporate IP owners, by re-orienting regulatory scrutiny of their activities as they grow in the public interest. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:20 pm by Jason Kelley
It is unfair for students to be forced to respond to potential sanctions before they’re given adequate information about the behavior for which they may be sanctioned. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, self-styled originalists who don't want to be seen as rejecting Brown v. [read post]