Search for: "In v. United States"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 102,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Supreme Court ruled against Intel Corporation in, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:23 am
USA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:25 pm
Free Trade v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 5:24 am
.), the United States Secretary of the Interior (Interior Secretary) may permit casino-style gaming on certain land taken into federal trust for an Indian tribe, so long as the Governor of the state where the land is located concurs. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm
He disagreed with the majority’s lengthy analysis, considering the result compelled by United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:14 pm
., standards (see this column’s recent blog on United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
8 May 2017, 11:00 am
In February the American Civil Liberties Union and partner organizations filed a lawsuit challenging, on statutory and constitutional grounds, President's Trump's original and then revised executive order blocking citizens of six mostly Muslim countries from entering the United States for 90 days, with exemptions. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 3:30 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 1:52 am
Hendron v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 12:16 am
The talc was then processed for use by companies across the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:22 pm
Lott, Jr. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 8:38 pm
In Zavalin v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:48 am
Azumah v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently addressed this question in Peugh v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 2:06 am
It states: (1) This section applies where a person has made an asylum claim and – (a) his claim has been rejected by the Secretary of State, but (b) he has been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a period exceeding one year (or for periods exceeding one year in aggregate). (2) The person may appeal to the Tribunal against the rejection of his asylum claim. [read post]
