Search for: "John Doe D" Results 5021 - 5040 of 9,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2013, 11:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
The following is my my prepared statement for today’s hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Jules Bailey, D-Portland, is circulating a petition asking that the farm bill be removed from the special-session package. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:04 am
First, the PTO should be prohibited from citing supplemental registration against principal register applications under Section 2(d). [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:56 am by Jonathan Bailey
The stamp, which was based on a photo taken by a former Marine named John Alli, featured the memorial and prompted Gaylord to sue. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by John Dean
  The plaintiff here cites evidence from the trial that defendants “directly encourage[d] people to post offensive and defamatory content that will get noticed. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 12:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
A Poisonous Affair: America, Iraq, and the Gassing of Halabja by Joost R. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Fort Wayne, Indiana -- Trademark lawyers for 80/20, Inc. of Columbia City, Indiana filed a trademark infringement suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging John Doe d/b/a TNutz of Champlain, New York infringed the trademark "80/20", Trademark Registration No. 2,699,302, which has been registered with the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm by Ron Coleman
This is self-evident and does not need further elaboration. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
You could try to attack my credibility, but since I’m saying I heard this story from John Doe, and I trust John Doe, you’re pretty well stymied in attacking the inherent believability and accuracy of the axe murderer story. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 1:06 pm by WIMS
    Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) issued a statement and background document. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 2:16 pm by Joe Patrice
But how does this jive with the argument that the only way to understand the law is to spend three years in school? [read post]