Search for: "John Does 1- 5"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 5,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2009, 11:07 pm
Suffice it to say that (factor 1) the identity of the marks weighed heavily in favor of the Section 2(d) refusal. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:08 am
What does that mean? [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 11:57 am
John Does 1-5 dba fbpokerchips.com, Case No. 3:09-cv-03265-MHP, filed in N.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:46 am
Where a statute or execution action causes reverse discrimination. 5. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:20 pm
It seems to me that the design in question is indeed so simple as to be the cheapest way to provide the particular utilitarian features of a bird feeder.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
For the purpose of this analysis, we'll assume such a duty exists (even though I don't think it does). [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 8:52 am
Footnotes: [1] Zacharias v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:58 pm
July 21, 2009 1). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
A higher average age is "probably good for financials because it does mean higher savings. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 6:41 am
July 5, 1995). [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
It seems clear that, once a product is covered by a utility patent, a trademark applicant is going to have a heck of a time convincing the Board that the product design somehow qualifies for a trademark registration.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
This post is by my colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
The court found that the V3 product infringes JVW’s patent, while the V4 product does not. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 10:23 am
Shopping through Bing will get you 1% to 5% off on specified purchases for as long as Microsoft continues to feel the need to bribe you to use Bing, over Google. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:08 am
Allegedly, Robert De Niro and John McEnroe were victims. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:24 pm
by John L. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:16 am
Bastress, John W. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
5% ? [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:48 pm
I should also point out that Naz Foundation does not imply that any morality-based legislation or governmental action is no longer permitted. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:17 pm
§ 955(i)(1): § 955. [read post]
