Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 5021 - 5040 of 35,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am by Florian Mueller
Delrahim was in charge of DOJ-ATR (the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice), the opinion of the "United States" (as the federal government is called when filing amicus curiae briefs) was a resounding "never. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:38 pm by Molly Lockwood
Browning, Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in 1988–1989. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am by Nathan Dorn
The Works of JohnAdams, Second President, of the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:36 am by Joseph Kearney
The decision was by the most prominent of tribunals—the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 11:13 am by Paul Knettel and Peter Stuhldreher
On June 12, 2021, Judge Lynn Hughes in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas found that such a requirement was legally permissible in Jennifer Bridges v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Since then, numerous other cases, such as United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The Justice Department’s Civil Division told a federal appellate court that it will continue to try and defend former President Donald Trump in a libel suit brought by E. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm by vforberger
Code DWD 149.03 provides: (1)  Claimants and employing units. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:04 am by SHG
I know everybody says that and I know the sense in which it is meant, but the dear colleague letter was not in fact a statute of the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:50 pm by Ilya Somin
The State not only urges us to answer that question in the negative, but it also requests that we wholly abandon the proportionality framework from State v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:52 pm by Patricia Salkin
VI of the United States Constitution, the Supremacy Clause, because federal regulation of marijuana as a controlled substance preempts state authority to enact c. 94G. [read post]