Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 5,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
CUSTOMS logo barred by sections 2(a) and 2(b): In re Peter S Herrick, PA (TTABlog) TTAB enters judgment on the pleadings against applicant who admitted non-use of its mark Esprit IP Limited v Mellbeck Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
".Can any reader shed light on this reference? [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:21 am
(Ars Technica) New Zealand NZ releases consultation on revised three strikes proposal (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) Nigeria 2 Face Idibia sheds light on music industry in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Norway Pirate Bay block violates democratic principles, says Norway’s largest ISP Telenor (TorrentFreak) Spain Domain name ‘seguridadsocial.es’ finds its (secure) way home (Class 46) Sweden Pirate Bay… [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
On October 1, 2008, the Court vacated the decision of the April 4, 2007 WCAC decision and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for reconsideration in light of Stokes v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:49 pm
Commw. 2006), and Foley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 11:03 am
In State Dep't of Transportation v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 10:43 pm
Just found them via Google Alerts and only have had time to read FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 3:31 am
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:36 am
For the liberal justices, I would call Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:10 pm
Here is the abstract: The landmark case of Griffin v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:24 am
Dolan v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Still, in light of the Colacicco GVR (grant, vacate, remand) order, it's prudent to look for other cases that also involve judicial notice of FDA actions and related information.Second, the Supreme Court decided Levine and raised the bar for implied preemption based upon FDA actions concerning prescription drugs. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
This has been the uninterrupted doctrine of the Supreme Court since the 1833 ruling in Barron v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
The whistleblower case, Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Forest Grove v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 3:58 pm
First, the bar to summary judgment remains a high one: Lameman at para. 11. [read post]
