Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 5,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Specifically, defendants need to keep in mind what implied Buckman preemption can and can’t do.Specifically, as a matter of express preemption, Lohr created – under the rationale that remedies don’t matter – an exception for largely undefined state-law claims that are “identical” to FDA regulatory standards. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
The taking into account of this argument necessarily leads to the consideration of the applicant's argumentation concerning the inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED, Appellee On Appeal from the 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-25539 O P I N I O N Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Baker Hughes Incorporated are in the midst of an arbitration proceeding to resolve patent disputes. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
In Elisa B. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 6:30 am
Is there one and does it matter? [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
The Department stated: “The United States disagrees with plaintiffs’ unsupported assertion that the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause does not apply to the Vice President in his official capacity as the President of the Senate” (p.4 n. 1 & see also p.6). [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 10:00 am
B was number two. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
" The Court notes that Mexico asks that its request for the indication of provisional measures be treated as a matter of the greatest urgency "in view of the extreme gravity and immediacy of the threat that authorities in the United States will execute a Mexican national [a Texas court has scheduled Mr. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am
Thus, trying non-citizens for crimes committed while functionally intertwined with forward-deployed servicemembers in a zone of active combat operations presented the strongest case for military jurisdiction both as a matter of constitutional law and U.S. policy, leaving the harder questions about military jurisdiction over U.S. citizen civilians and/or civilians inside the United States for another day. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
(Art. 12.4, Council draft) b. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am
§ 15A-1343(b)(13)? [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Richard Anderson v. the United Kingdom,The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:Lech Garlicki, President,Nicolas Bratza,Giovanni Bonello,Ljiljana Mijovic,Päivi Hirvelä,Ledi Bianku,Nebojša Vucinic, judges,and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 January 2010,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE# The case… [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
failure to function can be significant in ordinary cases with uncontroversial subject matter. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am
You can't slice up a priority rightToday we have the first instance decision in the opposition against European patent 2771468 having the title "ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, METHODS AND OPTIMIZED GUIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR SEQUENCE MANIPULATION" (PCT/US13/74819). [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
(b) Information from the Social Security Administration is considered conclusive, absent specific evidence showing that the information was erroneous.3. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The bonds in both the Jacobson and Nine Thirty FEF matters contain riders which provide that they will cover loss resulting directly from the dishonest acts of any Outside Investment Advisor na [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:11 am
But, no matter, the bankers wanted it and he vetoed it anyway, so… surprise! [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
When I was courting my wife, I volunteered that no matter how long we lived, the human voice I would recognize before that of any other person was Vin Scully’s. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
State Bar (1960) 54 Cal.2d 659, 7 Cal.Rptr. 746, 355 P.2d 490. [read post]
