Search for: "MATTER OF C A" Results 5021 - 5040 of 36,768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2021, 10:52 am by Matthias Weller
Rescheduled: “The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Prospects for Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters between the EU and Third Countries” – Conference on 9 and 10 September 2022, University of Bonn, Germany In preparation of the Conference on the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention on 9/10 September 2022, planned to be taking place on campus of the University of Bonn, Germany, we are offering here a Repository of contributions to the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
In this respect, requests for pseudonymity in such cases might not just be a matter of protecting privacy[7] but also be a matter of protecting reputation and preventing retaliation. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Under these circumstances, opined the Appellate Division, Plaintiff substantially prevailed within the meaning of Public Officers Law §89(4)(c), citing Matter of Madeiros v New York State Educ. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Nearly every critic of Roe has argued that the Court erred by recognizing a right regarding a matter as to which the Constitution is supposedly silent. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:33 pm by Emily Dai
Racine, attorney general for the District of Columbia; Barry C. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:29 am by Chris Castle
First, the fact that Spotify has paid “significant amounts of money for the content” doesn’t matter if they paid it to someone who doesn’t own all the rights. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 In the matter of an application by Margaret McQuillan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), In the matter of an application by Mary McKenna for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), and In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 14-16 June 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Devin DeBacker
” “[C]oordinate[s] and consult[s] with private sector leaders on cybersecurity and emerging technology issues in support of, and in coordination with,” relevant officials. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The matter now returns to the High Court for compensation to be determined. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:06 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States addresses statutory time limits on the president’s power to impose tariffs on imported goods as a matter of national security. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:17 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
  Section 27(3)(c) also allows the Ombud to decline to entertain a complaint on the basis that a court or some other dispute resolution forum is a more appropriate forum to decide the complaint. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:02 am by Nerushka Bowan
Chapter 9 (excluding sections 11B, 11C, 11D, and 56A(3)(c), (d) and (e) of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act, 2007, from the Schedule of laws repealed or amended in terms of section 58) – this section deals with the general provisions and sets out which other laws are repealed or amended by this Act. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The grand jury subpoena sought communications and other records related to fundraising and accounting by groups including Defending the Republic, a group claiming 501(c) 4 nonprofit status and a PAC by the same name. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:41 am by Krzysztof Pacula
This question lies at the heart of the request for a preliminary ruling lodged by French Cour de Cassation before the Court of Justice in the case V A and Z A, C-645/20. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 8:25 am by David Post
But Casey - as Justice Thomas, who was on the Court at the time, is surely aware - settled the matter: Constitutional protection of the woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy derives from the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]