Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 5021 - 5040
of 21,686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
It ruled that Article 97(5) of 2009 EU Trade Mark Regulation must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a European Union trade mark may bring an infringement action against an infringer before a European Union trade mark court of the Member State within which the consumers or traders to whom that advertising and those offers for sale are directed are located, notwithstanding that that third party took decisions and steps in another Member State… [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
; Brown v State of New York, 114 AD3d 632), increases the likelihood that a party will not receive proper notice of a legal proceeding. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:07 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
Hollingsworth and Mark A. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 7:24 am
This marked the beginning of the end. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:55 am
Heasley).The TTAB has (almost always) followed the principle laid down by the CAFC in Herbko v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
AB5 is “still very much a work in progress,” Mark I. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
E, Moritz v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
” On the second point, the authorization for committee staff to question witnesses is an exercise of Rule XI, clause 2(j)(2)(C) of the House rules, which states that committees may so authorize staff. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:52 am
Christie Brinkley Skincare, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:21 pm
September marks the beginning of the academic year and an official end to the summer break. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:15 am
ThermoLife Int’l, L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:03 am
United States and Skilling v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In Hoyt v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In Hoyt v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 7:08 am
In Hoyt v. [read post]
