Search for: "Matter of Robert T"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 10,569
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
House Democrats aren’t persuaded and see the move as part of a broader erosion of transparency under the Trump administration. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Context thus does matter to Japan in assessing whether there has been an armed attack” (emphasis added). [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 3:38 pm
” If that wasn’t enough, little else about this episode gives the memo any more credence. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:24 pm
We can’t let Big Tech stamp out our hard-won advancements. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court being held in a 7-2 decision (Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting),Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am
First Amendment Claims: The court says the key question as to Austin’s First Amendment claims was whether she was speaking as an employee on a matter of employment or a citizen on a matter of public concern. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 7:45 am
Ancel, Paul T. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 6:53 pm
[The role of lobbying in the legislative and regulatory process in India has been the subject matter of great debate lately. [read post]
25 May 2010, 3:00 am
That is true of anyone who pays tax (or any other expense, for that matter). [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
On Roberts, on Gorsuch, on Sotomayor. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
Its words hadn’t changed. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
After a tumultuous spring semester in which administrators came in for criticism for either over-reacting or under-reacting to students protesting the war in Gaza, many colleges and universities spent the summer revising their policies for addressing such matters going forward. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
It didn't. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
After deliberation, the jury found that Jordan wasn’t negligent and that Torain and the City weren’t negligent either. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
After deliberation, the jury found that Jordan wasn’t negligent and that Torain and the City weren’t negligent either. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:36 pm
As Chief Justice Roberts suggested, under the County's position in this case, there wouldn't be much point to the Takings Clause. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
A violation of the law doesn’t hinge on what you say, the Court explained; all that matters is where you say it. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:49 am
You can go back and read it, or I can give you the short version, which is this: In Crawford, Scalia explained that only thing that mattered in determining whether admission of an out-of-court statement violated the Confrontation Clause was whether it was testimonial; whether it was reliable wasn’t relevant. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit didn't, as a formal legal matter, result in any coercive judgment against anyone: No party is subject to any judicial decree, and no one is legally obligated to alter their behavior, as a result. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 1:00 pm
My gosh, say it ain’t so! [read post]
