Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 5021 - 5040 of 6,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
’ (para [75]) The significance of this is that the Supreme Court has minimised the judicial role and maximised the agreement by stating that the court ‘should give effect’ to the prenuptial agreement rather than subsuming it within a broad judicial discretion. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:06 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
The Supreme Court's judgment in Velusamy v Patchaiammal yesterday drew sharp criticism from Additional Solicitor General Indira Jaising, and rightly so. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
As Eady J said in X & Y v Persons Unknown[2006] EWHC 2783 (QB), [2007] EMLR 290 at para 72: “…the Spycatcher doctrine [Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 at 375, 380] would go on inhibiting third parties from publishing the relevant information notionally pending a trial which would never actually take place. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:02 am by Gilles Cuniberti
C v C (Ancillary Relief: Nuptial Settlement) [2004] EWCA Civ 1030, [2005] Fam 250, at para 31. 104. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:26 pm
Carter-Reed Co., LLC, will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide 64,004 and CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law 32,144. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm by Marie Louise
  Highlights this week included: CAFC denies outsourcing of inventorship to foreign countries: Solvay v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:19 am by Jeff Gamso
  She was counsel of record for the state in State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:55 am by Vikram Raghavan
State of Bihar be shapeless, formless like Agni or Vayu , or even a simple piece of wood. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 8:51 am
McAfee, Inc., Case No.: 10-CV-01455-LHK, will be reported at CCH Advertising Law Guide 64,007. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:42 pm
Industries, Inc., No. 08-7078, will appear at CCH 2010-2 Trade Cases 77,188. [read post]