Search for: "Patently Yours" Results 5021 - 5040 of 15,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
 Whether it be to finally catch-up on the bombardment of emails into your inbox, or to stop your children getting too old too fast, or to just allow you a breath to figure out your next move. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:01 am by Brett Trout
Ethics and a slavish adherence to common decency prevent me from taking your money but, depending upon the complexity and aesthetics of your device, I might just be convinced to blow my entire annual art budget on the right machine. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 1:02 pm
Do stop by and check FedCirc.us out…your comments, thoughts and ideas are always appreciated. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 8:33 am
And not to deliver your product where there is a small market for you in China and India because the chance to be copied is [silence]. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:25 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Patent Office Would Like Your Opinion on 101 Interim Examination Instructions The USPTO has prepared interim examination instructions for evaluating patent... [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Dickinson Wright and John Artz (Patently-O) (PharmaPatents) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:36 am by A. Jennings Stone
Don’t worry if the idea is not fully developed, as you can expand on the initial ideas in your patent for up to a year. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
I have a poll running on LinkedIn on whether card-game patents should be patent eligible: Include Your Vote. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:24 pm by Gene Quinn
If you believe that prior user rights are insignificant and don't deserve discussion you have permission to keep your head firmly planted in the sand. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:18 am by Lorraine Fleck
Finding CORVUS and CORVO Confusingly Similar for Wine, TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition http://bit.ly/PzMAGt  via @ TTABlog Probe sheds light on Canada’s lucrative online drug industry http://bit.ly/LHyOMX  Kodak loses digital image preview patent case against RIM, Apple; could affect Kodak’s bankruptcy patent sales http://bit.ly/LHvWj4  An Olympian struggle: IOC vs. social media http://bit.ly/NE1r0t  BBC News – London 2012: Organisers clarify… [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
On March 10, 2008, the latter sent a fax, which read:“For the attention of the OD Dear Sirs, Re: European Patent Application […]Reference is made to your Communication dated December 13, 2007. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
 There are two clear ways to prevent these sort of China IP problems: register your IP (trademarks, copyrights, licensing agreements and/or patents in China) and use a China contract that works, typically a China-centric NNN Agreement. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Douglas Keene
We do a lot of patent work wherein a major goal is to show how two things are the same or different. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:04 am by Joshua Auriemma
 The response was both thoughtful and reasonable: “Have you ever tried to use Google Patents on your iPhone? [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:09 am
Tun-Jen Chiang - The Levels of Abstraction Problem in Patent Law Problem: you get an invention by specifying it. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 2:06 pm by Gordon Firemark
Call us with your feedback:(310) 243-6231 In this Episode:  More about Aereo, Faulkner and Sherlock Holmes The Turtles lead class action over pre-1972 works No royalties after patent expires and more…   Full show notes available at http://entertainmentlawupdate.com Entertainment Law Update Podcast 43 – No copyright, Sherlock? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Simmons worked with Cook on development and marketing of his exercise machines, and then Cook began developing a competing device, for which he obtained a patent. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:05 am by Trent
From a practical perspective, studying decisions that involve subject matter patent-eligibility is a great way to improve your claim and specification drafting skills because you can learn from applicants’ brilliant or not-so-brilliant moments. [read post]