Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 5021 - 5040 of 16,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2010, 6:28 am by John Gregory
To run for governor in Utah, one needs a nomination document signed by one thousand people. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am by Jeff Gamso
In a per curiam opinion (that either means one that nobody wants to admit to having written or it means that the panel wants to emphasize that it is speaking with one voice) Judges Martin, Boggs fergodssake, and Cole hold that police need some justification before breaking down the door and entering a private residence.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:39 pm
  He first quotes from Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 8:39 pm
Do they really want to take Google down, or are they trying to do something else? [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Colin Murray
” For Kearns J (citing McKenna v An Taoiseach (No.2) [1995] 2 I.R. 10) the issue of justiciability came down to whether the case involved “a clear disregard by the Government of the powers and duties conferred on it by the Constitution”. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:12 pm by Lindsay Griffiths
This is to cut down on spammers, who would follow as many people as possible and send them meaningless junk. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 7:44 am by Eric Goldman
US (Guest Blog Post) * Indianapolis Police Have Been “Blinded Lately Because They Shut Backpage Down” * Constitutional Challenge Against FOSTA Filed–Woodhull v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Rooks’ company purchased used exercise equipment that broke down less than a year later. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  “You’re killing these people. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, based in Boston, ruled on June 9 in Cook v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 3:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I could reasonably be accused of being overoptimistic about norms, but good v. destructive/counterproductive/discriminatory/otherwise suboptimal are different things. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
So batten down the hatches, everyone: We’re in for a real snor’easter. [read post]