Search for: "People v. Waits" Results 5021 - 5040 of 5,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2012, 11:58 am by Lara
  Since this one is just starting to play out, we’ll have to wait and see. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court rulings on flawed jury instructions used prior to 1991.The 5-4 decision did not affect Hood's 1990 conviction in the shooting death of two people in Plano. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm by Jim Sedor
“I’ve never worried a whole lot about what people think,&r [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:16 pm
By reading Justice Blackmun's infamous dictum in Jones v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Tobin Admin
Indeed, he insisted that other people within the company would be better suited to answer questions regarding certain topics. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 1:14 am
Thanks to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Riley v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
When Trump assumed office in 2017, he and his associates did not have such well developed policies and personnel in waiting. [read post]
  It’s about 3 people who were arrested by a DRE in Cobb County, Georgia, for DUI-marijuana. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
Under the policy, non-Mexican asylum applicants who enter the United States at the nation’s southern border must wait in Mexico while their applications are processed. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unfiltered complaints v. investigated complaints: do client a big favor (and the AG too) by providing input early on. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
There are 16 more ships waiting to leave Odesa in the coming days, according to Ukraine’s infrastructure minister, Oleksandr Kurbakov. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Typical time to commercialization: 7 years, waiting for demand to build up. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  People don’t understand counterintuitive rules, and the rules without an exemption are counterintuitive. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 6:01 am by John-Paul Boyd
These goals are rarely achieved with a three-V approach to dispute resolution. [read post]