Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 10,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2010, 6:10 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted Amex's motion to dismiss. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:41 am
His concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:57 am
United States, 74 Fed. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The United States, however, is among a handful of countries that have both. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 3:44 pm
Law): United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
United States as if it put to rest the serious First Amendment concerns prepublication review raises. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm
United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm
Tam relies in particular on the Commission’s decision in S v United Kingdom (1984) 40 DR 196. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 2:41 pm
United States could have an impact on statutory construction going forward. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
The bill extends for two years the provision providing for payment of $13.25 per gallon to cover over a $13.50 per proof gallon excise tax on distilled spirits produced in or imported into the United States. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:47 pm
The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied McVicker’s motion to compel the publisher to reveal the identities of the website’s users. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:18 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:13 am
He was fired in June, two months after his second administrative complaint, for the stated reason that he had exhausted his leave under the short-term disability policy. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:19 am
Connecticut, a case pending in the Supreme Court of the United States — we examine how three potential obstacles to merits adjudication — political question doctrine, standing, and preemption — should be evaluated in recognition of the significance of prods and pleas. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:10 am
First, EESA and HAMP were designed to “provide authority and facilities that the Secretary of the Treasury can use to restore liquidity and stability to the financial system of the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
This is just one more reason that we need the Supreme Court to review the issue.The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:16 am
Supreme Court upheld a criminal ban on "material support" of "terrorism" first placed in the Federal Code in the 1990s.Plaintiffs in Holder v. [read post]
