Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 5021 - 5040 of 5,196
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 8:16 pm
" [1] There have been similar moves taken by Steinbröck's counterparts in the States. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am by Laura Stefani
Bear in mind that the 333 Exemption process is, in theory, in place only temporarily, until the FAA finalizes its anticipated UAS regs. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 5:46 pm by Erik Gerding
Google v China: Do we know corporate social responsibility when we see it? [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
Although the majority of the analysis is redacted, Judge Collyer spends a good portion of the opinion reviewing 702 targeting and minimization procedures, emphasizing post-tasking analysis, [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:36 pm by Peter Tillers
 But such a defense of the debate about mathematical analysis of evidence is a bit like saying that WWII was a good thing because it led to the development of V-2 rockets. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by Patricia Hughes
The test in Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:05 am by Joseph Margulies
Habib, who is Australian, had been one of the four petitioners in Rasul v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Relation of this Final Rule to the July 2, 2009, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking V. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In May 2024, Colorado became the first state to adopt comprehensive AI-related legislation, as discussed here. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   Judge Rakoff also rejected the argument that the allegedly misleading statements about the company’s business and management were mere “opinion” or “puffery,” stating that “where (as here alleged) the statements were made repeatedly in an effort to reassure the investing public about the Company’s integrity, a reasonable investor could rely on them as reflective of the true state of affairs at the company. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
”[3] Sir Richard opines that relative risks under two can be shown to be causal associations, but often with massive data, randomization, and a good deal of support from experimental work. [read post]