Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 5021 - 5040 of 28,990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2021, 8:42 am by Ed Yohnka
  One ongoing case that highlights both the absurdity of qualified immunity and the extent to which officials may go under its protection is Black Lives Matter D.C. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Aila Hoss
Supreme Court stated in Seminole Nation v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Likewise, a minor who is at least 16 years old, lives apart from any parent or guardian, and manages her own financial affairs can consent to medical treatment. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:11 am by Robert Epstein
Overturning Default Judgments in Texas Pursuant to Craddock v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 2:19 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am by SHG
The new case, Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:06 pm by Robert J. Miller
” Then, in 1973, the Court held that a state could not impose its income tax on a tribal citizen who lived and worked on a reservation in McClanahan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:58 pm by Barsumian Armiger
As part of the admission of 77-year-old Jane Doe II (“Jane”) to Carmel Senior Living (“CSL”), an assisted living facility in Carmel, Indiana, her guardian, Jane Doe I (“Guardian”), executed a residency agreement with CSL that contained an arbitration clause requiring claims against it be arbitrated. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
The others eventually found their way out of prison, their lives shattered because Alabama refused to admit that whites had lied about Blacks. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am by Roel van Woudenberg
By communication dated 18 May 2020 the Board informed the parties that the oral proceedings had been rescheduled for 8 February 2021.V. [read post]