Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 13,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 1:58 pm
In addition, the structure of the agreements between Ingenico and VeriFone, the only two significant POS sellers in the United States post-merger, enhances VeriFone and Ingenico’s ability to coordinate pricing for all POS terminals.The complaint is U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:18 pm
The price is $89.95 with the price of $69.95 for members of the Section of State and Local Government Law (discounts on books and CLE: another good reason to join the Section). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:14 am
The United States Supreme Court case of American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:52 pm
The bill—introduced in the wake of a leaked Supreme Court draft decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 3:01 pm
Wool v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
’” In examining the issue, the court specifically stated that “[t]he case of Finger v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Revised opinion: Takings claims about billboard regulation State of Texas v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Concord EFS, Inc. 13-63Issue: Whether a plaintiff who purchases directly from a member of a price-fixing conspiracy is necessarily a “direct purchaser” under Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 10:13 am
Simply stated, every audit relating to the pricing of a government contract or subcontract and/or the billing of costs under such contracts is an investigation in waiting. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
See also, Holly Sugar Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
In 1997, in State Oil v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Level One Construction Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Ezra Rosser In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 1:10 am
DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Business Law Ameritrade Not Under Duty to Route Put Contracts To Multiple Markets, Execute at Quoted, 'Best' Price Gurfein v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:59 am
John Fund v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:54 pm
Conversely, for investors trying to predict which bonds to avoid and which to buy, the matter is equally important – and indeed, should be reflected in prices (for recent empirical papers, see here, here and here). [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
US price $122.00; Euro Price €95.00. [read post]
