Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 13,699
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
" [para 34] However, the fact that a mark has been registered as a figurative mark does not mean that other classifications are not possible. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:01 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
If personality is an unbroken series of successful gestures, then there was something gorgeous about him, some heightened sensitivity to the promises of life, as if he were related to one of those intricate machines that register earthquakes ten thousand miles away. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
It has been struck down by a federal appeals court, in a case involving a rock music band that wanted to register its name, the SLANTS, for protection as a trademark. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Those provisions clearly state that in order for a mark to be considered generic the mark must lose its primary significance towards less than all of the goods and services for which the mark is registered (15 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:33 am
The case, known as Packingham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:33 am
The case, known as Packingham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:33 am
The case, known as Packingham v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:00 am
In Monday’s decision in the newly minted, Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Combe Incorporated v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
” As five justices found (in separate opinions) in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:34 pm
Cox in the Fourth Circuit and UMG v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:06 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 1:30 pm
” State v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Although Tam quotes the statutory provision in the federal trademark law that states that merely descriptive marks cannot be registered as trademarks, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:25 am
In Matal v. [read post]
