Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 5021 - 5040
of 16,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 9:24 pm
This suggests some core criteria that should be present whenever any regulation of tool providers is considered: 1) strong social consensus that there are concrete and significant harms to be addressed; 2) strong consensus that obligations should apply equally across all providers; 3) strong consensus the regulation is appropriately tailored and enforceable as a technical and practical matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 10:31 am
It is black-letter law, under United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 1:14 pm
July 12, 2013) (post) and Brazil v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
But Professor Marcus’s comments, however sound, do not at all lessen my strong support for a new constitutional convention. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 5:37 am
Yesterday, in a Supreme Court case called Brnovich v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:33 am
State courts have uniformly said it doesn't. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 10:26 am
Additional Resources: Coffey v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 8:17 pm
United States.) [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:38 am
Further, Lord Clarke said that he would not limit the relevance of the merits to a case where that party had such a strong case that he was entitled to summary judgment, stating “it is almost always wrong in principle to disregard that underlying merits altogether as irrelevant” (at paragraph 75). [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:29 am
Ever since the Court issued its decision in D.C. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:21 am
Citing Mead Johnson & Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
The appellate panel began by citing Vakharia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
Plaintiff’s Claim for an Account Stated Plaintiff moves for summary judgment on its cause of action for an account stated. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Courts may vacate an arbitration award if the arbitrator exceeded his or her authority by issuing an award that violates a strong public policy, is irrational or clearly exceeds a specific, enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power (see Matter of Shenendehowa Cent. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
And, I watched with some amazement as the Mexican Supreme Electoral Tribunal handled the 2006 presidential election contest (their equivalent of Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:22 pm
The Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Eric Smith v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 5:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
