Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 5021 - 5040 of 21,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2019, 3:34 am by Ronald Mann
[Disclosure: The author of this post represented the plaintiffs in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:53 am by Joy Waltemath
” However, the existence of such an agreement did not automatically determine liability under the successor liability doctrine, which is determined utilizing the Fifth Circuit’s nine-factor test. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:59 am by rstokes
Physicians often recommend more frequent and extensive prenatal testing, and may refer mothers to maternal-fetal specialists. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
Jander, which asks whether ERISA plaintiffs can state a claim for breach of a duty of prudence by making general allegations that the costs of undisclosed fraud grow over time. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:24 pm by Eric Beasley
The plaintiff also filed a workers’ compensation claim with his employer to recover benefits. [read post]
” Against that backdrop, the same New York-based law firms that have spearheaded the web accessibility litigation are now testing a new front: gift cards. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 8:07 am by Patricia Hughes
The Supreme Court of Canada sets out the test for determining whether speech is protected by section 2(b) as follows in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 9:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
The plaintiff commenced this action for divorce on January 9, 2012. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am by Jed Rubenfeld
Subpart D didn’t compel the tests; it merely permitted and immunized them. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Peter Mahler
Next, VC Glasscock concludes that Heartland’s amended complaint in the New Jersey action erases Carr’s previously-found right to advancement, reasoning as follows: The “by reason of the fact” test requires a causal nexus between the litigation and Carr’s official corporate capacity. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Documents submitted to a court to support or oppose a motion for summary judgment can only be sealed if they pass a First Amendment test. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Lead plaintiff competitions are not a race to the courthouse or a test of the fittest. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 7:07 am by Richard Hunt
In a larger context this case is part of a trend in which federal courts refuse to recognize dignitary harms to those who test websites without any intent to take advantage of the underlying goods and services. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:20 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Specifically, the court noted that the obligation to obtain consent rested with the physician who ordered the test, not the technician that performed the test. [read post]
This could embolden the plaintiff bar to initiate lawsuits against all companies selling homeopathic products – even those that survive the increased scrutiny of this new FDA enforcement policy. [read post]
This could embolden the plaintiff bar to initiate lawsuits against all companies selling homeopathic products – even those that survive the increased scrutiny of this new FDA enforcement policy. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:30 am by Linda S. Mullenix
Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Fees in Securities Fraud Class Actions, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 19-31 (July 15, 2019), available at SSRN. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 4:30 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
The court began by explaining that the defendant doctor’s involvement in the decedent’s treatment was as a fourth-year gastroenterology fellow and medical doctor; he allegedly failed to re-test the decedent’s blood coagulation profile and treat him accordingly prior to his surgery. [read post]